Najma vs Vijayan Advocate - N SATHEESH KUMAR, SINDHU P — 200058/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV330004812022

Filing Number

254/2022

Filing Date

19-Aug-2022

Registration No

200058/2022

Registration Date

19-Aug-2022

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Najma

    Adv. M.R. Chithralal, RANJITH KUMAR S, Arul KS, KARTHIKA S R

  2. 2.Najeeb

    Adv. CHITHRA LAL M R,RANJITH KUMAR S Arul KS KARTHIKA S R

  3. 3.Nijas

    Adv. CHITHRA LAL M R,RANJITH KUMAR S Arul KS KARTHIKA S R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayan Advocate - N SATHEESH KUMAR, SINDHU P

  2. 2.Lali

    Adv. N SATHEESH KUMAR,SINDHU P

  3. 3.Hena

    Adv. Ratheesh A,RAJESH M.S. Aravind Babu V

  4. 4.Dhanya

    Adv. Ratheesh A,RAJESH M.S. Aravind Babu V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court rejected the suit (O.S 58/2022) filed by Najma and others against Vijayan and others under Order 7 Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite sufficient opportunities provided. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking additional time for payment and lifted the previously passed attachment order, directing communication of this lifting to the Sub Registrar Office and Village Office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  6. 03-Nov-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  7. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  8. 22-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  9. 03-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  10. 07-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  11. 14-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  12. 05-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  13. 08-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  14. 05-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  15. 29-May-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  16. 24-Jan-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  17. 17-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  18. 29-Sep-2022

    Issue notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  19. 27-Sep-2022

    Issue notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  20. 14-Sep-2022

    Issue notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  21. 04-Sep-2022

    Issue notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  22. 23-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 19-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200058/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the suit (O.S 58/2022) filed by Najma and others against Vijayan and others under Order 7 Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite sufficient opportunities provided. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application seeking additional time for payment and lifted the previously passed attachment order, directing communication of this lifting to the Sub Registrar Office and Village Office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case