Peter Sunderdas vs Deepak Advocate - G Jayakumar — 200039/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 OrdersIV,VI&VII. Status: call on. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV330002412024
e-Filing Number
20-06-2024
Filing Number
152/2024
Filing Date
20-Jun-2024
Registration No
200039/2024
Registration Date
20-Jun-2024
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Peter Sunderdas
Adv. ANANDAKUTTAN M R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepak Advocate - G Jayakumar
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
31-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
12-Mar-2026
Objection
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
16-Dec-2025
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
15-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sub Judge's court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Peter Sunderadas) in his suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The defendant was restrained from alienating, encumbering, or damaging the disputed property, which the petitioner had developed as part of a residential villa project. The court found that the petitioner established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him (having invested substantial funds in development), and denial of the injunction would cause irreparable injury. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Oct-2025
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
09-Oct-2025
For Orders
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Sep-2025
For orders in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
22-Aug-2025
For Orders
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
29-Jul-2025
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
02-Jul-2025
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
16-Jun-2025
For further hearing
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
11-Jun-2025
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
05-Jun-2025
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
09-Jan-2025
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
20-Nov-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Oct-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
28-Sep-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
09-Sep-2024
For reports
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
03-Sep-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
17-Aug-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
13-Aug-2024
for hearing in IA
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
24-Jul-2024
For commission report
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
19-Jul-2024
For commission report
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
29-Jun-2024
For commission report
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
26-Jun-2024
For commission report
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
24-Jun-2024
For Objection and hearing
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
22-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200039/2024
Summary: The Sub Judge's court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner (Peter Sunderadas) in his suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The defendant was restrained from alienating, encumbering, or damaging the disputed property, which the petitioner had developed as part of a residential villa project. The court found that the petitioner established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored him (having invested substantial funds in development), and denial of the injunction would cause irreparable injury. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts