Peter Sunderdas vs Shaji Kaniyanattu Advocate - G Jayakumar — 200038/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order IV,VI,VII. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV330002402024
Next Hearing
05th August 2026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2024
Filing Number
151/2024
Filing Date
12-06-2024
Registration No
200038/2024
Registration Date
12-06-2024
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Peter Sunderdas
Adv. ANANDAKUTTAN M R
Respondent(s)
Shaji Kaniyanattu Advocate - G Jayakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Issues
Issues
Issues
For orders in IA
For orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Issues |
| 16-12-2025 | Issues |
| 15-10-2025 | Issues |
| 09-10-2025 | For orders in IA |
| 18-09-2025 | For orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The Court of the Sub Judge, Nedumangad granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent (Shaji Kaniyanattu) from alienating, encumbering, or committing any acts of waste or damage to the disputed property. The petitioner (Peter Sunderadas), a developer, established a prima facie case under a December 8, 2023 sale agreement for a villa development project and satisfied the three-fold test for injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury), warranting preservation of the property until trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The Court of the Sub Judge, Nedumangad granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent (Shaji Kaniyanattu) from alienating, encumbering, or committing any acts of waste or damage to the disputed property. The petitioner (Peter Sunderadas), a developer, established a prima facie case under a December 8, 2023 sale agreement for a villa development project and satisfied the three-fold test for injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury), warranting preservation of the property until trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts