Peter Sunderdas vs Shaji Kaniyanattu Advocate - G Jayakumar — 200038/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order IV,VI,VII. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Issues Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV330002402024

e-Filing Number

11-06-2024

Filing Number

151/2024

Filing Date

12-Jun-2024

Registration No

200038/2024

Registration Date

12-Jun-2024

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order IV,VI,VII
Specific Relief Act 1963 \ Section 16,20,37 and 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Peter Sunderdas

    Adv. ANANDAKUTTAN M R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shaji Kaniyanattu Advocate - G Jayakumar

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  4. 15-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The Court of the Sub Judge, Nedumangad granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent (Shaji Kaniyanattu) from alienating, encumbering, or committing any acts of waste or damage to the disputed property. The petitioner (Peter Sunderadas), a developer, established a prima facie case under a December 8, 2023 sale agreement for a villa development project and satisfied the three-fold test for injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury), warranting preservation of the property until trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  6. 09-Oct-2025

    For orders in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For orders in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    For orders in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  9. 29-Jul-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  10. 02-Jul-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  11. 16-Jun-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  15. 20-Nov-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  16. 18-Oct-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  17. 28-Sep-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  18. 09-Sep-2024

    For reports

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  19. 03-Sep-2024

    for hearing in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  20. 17-Aug-2024

    for hearing in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  21. 13-Aug-2024

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  22. 24-Jul-2024

    for hearing in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  23. 19-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  24. 29-Jun-2024

    For commission report

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  25. 26-Jun-2024

    For commission report

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  26. 12-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200038/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed – The Court of the Sub Judge, Nedumangad granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent (Shaji Kaniyanattu) from alienating, encumbering, or committing any acts of waste or damage to the disputed property. The petitioner (Peter Sunderadas), a developer, established a prima facie case under a December 8, 2023 sale agreement for a villa development project and satisfied the three-fold test for injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury), warranting preservation of the property until trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case