Geetha, Aged 43, vs Reej, Aged 28 Advocate - C.R.Rajeev — 200082/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLTV330001902011
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
201618/2011
Filing Date
29-07-2011
Registration No
200082/2011
Registration Date
29-07-2011
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Geetha, Aged 43,
Adv. A. Kesava Pillai
Chandra kumari
Adv. A. Kesava Pillai
Jayasree, Aged 39
Adv. A. Kesava Pillai
Respondent(s)
Reej, Aged 28 Advocate - C.R.Rajeev
Raveendran, Aged 49
Hareesh, Aged 17
Keerthi, Aged 16
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
FOR HEARING
call on
FOR HEARING
Listed to
call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | call on |
| 05-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 21-11-2025 | Listed to |
| 09-10-2025 | call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appeal suit (A.S. No. 82/2011) filed by Geetha, Chandra Kumary, and Jayasree against the judgment dated 28/03/2011 was dismissed for default by the Sub Judge of Nedumangad on 27th March 2023. The appellants failed to appear and argue the matter despite being given ample opportunity, resulting in the dismissal of their appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appeal suit (A.S. No. 82/2011) filed by Geetha, Chandra Kumary, and Jayasree against the judgment dated 28/03/2011 was dismissed for default by the Sub Judge of Nedumangad on 27th March 2023. The appellants failed to appear and argue the matter despite being given ample opportunity, resulting in the dismissal of their appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts