State of Kerala vs M/s Southers Field Ventures private Limited Company Advocate - Shyam Sekhar.K.R — 200021/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: call on. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV330001082023
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
103/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
200021/2023
Registration Date
10-03-2023
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. District Govt. Pleader
Respondent(s)
M/s Southers Field Ventures private Limited Company Advocate - Shyam Sekhar.K.R
M/s Jayashree Tea Garden Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
call on
Call With IA
No sitting notified
call on
call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | call on |
| 04-02-2026 | Call With IA |
| 06-01-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 03-11-2025 | call on |
| 03-10-2025 | call on |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The State of Kerala's petition for a temporary injunction restraining Southern Field Ventures Private Limited and Jayashree Tea Garden Ltd from transferring or damaging the Merchiston Tea Estate (707 acres) was dismissed on 9 January 2024. The court found Kerala failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership, noting the respondents have held continuous possession since purchasing the property via valid sale deeds in 1946, 1954, and 2005, with the forest department confirming no claim over most disputed portions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The State of Kerala's petition for a temporary injunction restraining Southern Field Ventures Private Limited and Jayashree Tea Garden Ltd from transferring or damaging the Merchiston Tea Estate (707 acres) was dismissed on 9 January 2024. The court found Kerala failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership, noting the respondents have held continuous possession since purchasing the property via valid sale deeds in 1946, 1954, and 2005, with the forest department confirming no claim over most disputed portions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts