Rajan vs K Vidyadharan — 200006/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1. Status: For L C R. Next hearing: 03rd September 2026.

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLTV330000852025

For L C R

Next Hearing

03rd September 2026

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

119/2025

Filing Date

11-04-2025

Registration No

200006/2025

Registration Date

11-04-2025

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order43Rule1
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section RajanK Vidyadharan

Petitioner(s)

Rajan

Adv. BABURAJ V A

Sandhya

Adv. BABURAJ V A

Respondent(s)

K Vidyadharan

Vidyanathan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

04-04-2026

For L C R

01-04-2026

For orders in IA

12-03-2026

Objection

21-01-2026

FOR HEARING

09-12-2025

call on

Interim Orders

14-11-2025
Order
04-04-2026
Order

Case Summary Court: Court of Sub Judge, Nedumangad Order Date: April 4, 2026 Outcome: The application is allowed. The court granted a stay of execution proceedings in EP.84/2020 (execution petition) pending before the Munsiff Court, Nedumangad until the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. The court found that the petitioners satisfied the legal requirements under Order XLI Rule 5 of the CPC, 1908, demonstrating substantial loss would result without the stay and that the application was filed without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Court of Sub Judge, Nedumangad Order Date: April 4, 2026 Outcome: The application is allowed. The court granted a stay of execution proceedings in EP.84/2020 (execution petition) pending before the Munsiff Court, Nedumangad until the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. The court found that the petitioners satisfied the legal requirements under Order XLI Rule 5 of the CPC, 1908, demonstrating substantial loss would result without the stay and that the application was filed without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case