Ratheesh D.R vs Chellayyan Advocate - SHAJUDEEN M, ANIL KUMAR B V — 200009/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV330000842022
Filing Number
59/2022
Filing Date
18-Feb-2022
Registration No
200009/2022
Registration Date
18-Feb-2022
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ratheesh D.R
Adv. Shammi Vijayan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chellayyan Advocate - SHAJUDEEN M, ANIL KUMAR B V
-
2.Prakash
Adv. SHAJUDEEN M,ANIL KUMAR B V
-
3.Arun Prasad
Adv. SHAJUDEEN M,ANIL KUMAR B V
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary (OS 9/2022): The court rejected plaintiff Ratheesh D.R's suit against three defendants (Chellayyan, Prakash, and Arun Prasad) under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the CPC for failure to remit the balance court fee. Despite being granted multiple opportunities since issues were framed on 20-11-2025, the plaintiff did not file any application for time extension on the final hearing date and could not remit the required fee. The attachment order in IA1/2022 was consequently lifted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
10-Feb-2026
Bcf and steps
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
03-Jan-2026
Bcf and steps
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
20-Nov-2025
Bcf and steps
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
02-Aug-2025
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
05-Mar-2025
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
06-Nov-2024
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
15-Jul-2024
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
11-Apr-2024
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
14-Feb-2024
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
06-Dec-2023
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
28-Sep-2023
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
27-Jun-2023
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
27-Feb-2023
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Nov-2022
Issues
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
10-Oct-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
17-Sep-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
02-Jul-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Mar-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
15-Mar-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
05-Mar-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
19-Feb-2022
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 200009/2022
Case Summary (OS 9/2022): The court rejected plaintiff Ratheesh D.R's suit against three defendants (Chellayyan, Prakash, and Arun Prasad) under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the CPC for failure to remit the balance court fee. Despite being granted multiple opportunities since issues were framed on 20-11-2025, the plaintiff did not file any application for time extension on the final hearing date and could not remit the required fee. The attachment order in IA1/2022 was consequently lifted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts