Ratheesh D.R vs Chellayyan Advocate - SHAJUDEEN M, ANIL KUMAR B V — 200009/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV330000842022

Case disposed

Filing Number

59/2022

Filing Date

18-02-2022

Registration No

200009/2022

Registration Date

18-02-2022

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Ratheesh D.RChellayyan

Petitioner(s)

Ratheesh D.R

Adv. Shammi Vijayan

Respondent(s)

Chellayyan Advocate - SHAJUDEEN M, ANIL KUMAR B V

Prakash

Adv. SHAJUDEEN M,ANIL KUMAR B V

Arun Prasad

Adv. SHAJUDEEN M,ANIL KUMAR B V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-02-2026

BCF and steps

03-01-2026

BCF and steps

20-11-2025

BCF and steps

02-08-2025

Issues

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary (OS 9/2022): The court rejected plaintiff Ratheesh D.R's suit against three defendants (Chellayyan, Prakash, and Arun Prasad) under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the CPC for failure to remit the balance court fee. Despite being granted multiple opportunities since issues were framed on 20-11-2025, the plaintiff did not file any application for time extension on the final hearing date and could not remit the required fee. The attachment order in IA1/2022 was consequently lifted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (OS 9/2022): The court rejected plaintiff Ratheesh D.R's suit against three defendants (Chellayyan, Prakash, and Arun Prasad) under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the CPC for failure to remit the balance court fee. Despite being granted multiple opportunities since issues were framed on 20-11-2025, the plaintiff did not file any application for time extension on the final hearing date and could not remit the required fee. The attachment order in IA1/2022 was consequently lifted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case