ANIL KUMAR K.G vs RAJENDRAN K — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1. Status: Await LCR. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLTV330000412026

Await LCR

Next Hearing

07th July 2026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application For Stay During Pendency Of Appeal Section ANIL KUMAR K.G
IA/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section ANIL KUMAR K.GRAJENDRAN K
IA/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section ANIL KUMAR K.GRAJENDRAN K

Petitioner(s)

ANIL KUMAR K.G

Adv. Vikraman.S, Vikraman.S, KRISHNA, ASWATHY P S, KARTHIKA S R

ANITHA DEVI

Adv. Vikraman.S

DINESH V

Adv. Vikraman.S

PUSHPALATHA

Adv. Vikraman.S

Respondent(s)

RAJENDRAN K

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

22-05-2026

Await LCR

23-03-2026

For L C R

16-03-2026

For Orders

13-03-2026

for hearing in IA

02-03-2026

Issue notice

Interim Orders

23-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case