ANIL KUMAR K.G vs RAJENDRAN K — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1. Status: Await Lcr. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Await Lcr Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLTV330000412026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR K.G

    Adv. Vikraman.S, Vikraman.S, KRISHNA, ASWATHY P S, KARTHIKA S R

  2. 2.ANITHA DEVI

    Adv. Vikraman.S

  3. 3.DINESH V

    Adv. Vikraman.S

  4. 4.PUSHPALATHA

    Adv. Vikraman.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRAN K

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Await Lcr

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    For L C R

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    for hearing in IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case