ANIL KUMAR K.G vs RAJENDRAN K — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1. Status: Await LCR. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLTV330000412026
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL KUMAR K.G
Adv. Vikraman.S, Vikraman.S, KRISHNA, ASWATHY P S, KARTHIKA S R
ANITHA DEVI
Adv. Vikraman.S
DINESH V
Adv. Vikraman.S
PUSHPALATHA
Adv. Vikraman.S
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRAN K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Await LCR
For L C R
For Orders
for hearing in IA
Issue notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Await LCR |
| 23-03-2026 | For L C R |
| 16-03-2026 | For Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | for hearing in IA |
| 02-03-2026 | Issue notice |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 8/2026 Outcome: The stay application was ALLOWED. The court stayed the operation of the judgment and decree in OS.195/2020 until disposal of the appeal. Key Facts: Petitioners Anil Kumar, Anitha Devi, and Dinesh V appealed a trial court decree directing them to remove construction and cease obstructing respondent Rajendran K's use of a common pathway. Respondent filed an execution petition before the appeal period expired. The court found substantial injustice would result to petitioners if execution proceeded before appeal hearing and granted the stay, directing trial records be called for expedited appeal adjudication. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts