Hotel Mythri vs IFCI Ltd Advocate - R SANTHOSH MAHADEVAN — 200011/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTV330000292025
e-Filing Number
11-02-2025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
11-Feb-2025
Registration No
200011/2025
Registration Date
11-Feb-2025
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hotel Mythri
Adv. ANANDAKUTTAN M R
Respondent(s)
-
1.IFCI Ltd Advocate - R SANTHOSH MAHADEVAN
-
2.Abdul Rasheed alias Dr A R Babu
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-May-2026
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 200011/2025 Outcome: Application dismissed IFCI Limited sought to reject Hotel Mythri's plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, arguing the civil court lacked jurisdiction due to Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The court dismissed IFCI's application, holding that rejection of plaint must be based solely on plaint averments. Since the plaint itself contains no averments showing the matter was previously adjudicated, and IFCI failed to produce the alleged Debts Recovery Tribunal order dismissing Hotel Mythri's earlier application (SA 174/2020), the court found insufficient grounds to bar the suit on jurisdictional grounds. The suit concerning the validity of a lease agreement under Section 65A of the Transfer of Property Act proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
13-Mar-2026
For Orders
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
27-Feb-2026
For Orders
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
13-Feb-2026
For Orders
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
05-Feb-2026
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
29-Jan-2026
Issue notice
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
22-Jan-2026
Objection
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
12-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
21-Nov-2025
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
22-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
27-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
05-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
11-Apr-2025
Objection
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
14-Mar-2025
call on
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
18-Feb-2025
return of notice
Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad
-
12-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 200011/2025
Case Summary: 200011/2025 Outcome: Application dismissed IFCI Limited sought to reject Hotel Mythri's plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, arguing the civil court lacked jurisdiction due to Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The court dismissed IFCI's application, holding that rejection of plaint must be based solely on plaint averments. Since the plaint itself contains no averments showing the matter was previously adjudicated, and IFCI failed to produce the alleged Debts Recovery Tribunal order dismissing Hotel Mythri's earlier application (SA 174/2020), the court found insufficient grounds to bar the suit on jurisdictional grounds. The suit concerning the validity of a lease agreement under Section 65A of the Transfer of Property Act proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts