Hotel Mythri vs IFCI Ltd Advocate - R SANTHOSH MAHADEVAN — 200011/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTV330000292025

e-Filing Number

11-02-2025

Filing Number

43/2025

Filing Date

11-Feb-2025

Registration No

200011/2025

Registration Date

11-Feb-2025

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Specific Relief Act 1963 \ Section 34,37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hotel Mythri

    Adv. ANANDAKUTTAN M R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IFCI Ltd Advocate - R SANTHOSH MAHADEVAN

  2. 2.Abdul Rasheed alias Dr A R Babu

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-May-2026

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 200011/2025 Outcome: Application dismissed IFCI Limited sought to reject Hotel Mythri's plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, arguing the civil court lacked jurisdiction due to Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The court dismissed IFCI's application, holding that rejection of plaint must be based solely on plaint averments. Since the plaint itself contains no averments showing the matter was previously adjudicated, and IFCI failed to produce the alleged Debts Recovery Tribunal order dismissing Hotel Mythri's earlier application (SA 174/2020), the court found insufficient grounds to bar the suit on jurisdictional grounds. The suit concerning the validity of a lease agreement under Section 65A of the Transfer of Property Act proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    For Orders

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  13. 22-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  14. 27-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  15. 05-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  17. 14-Mar-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  18. 18-Feb-2025

    return of notice

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  19. 12-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200011/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 200011/2025 Outcome: Application dismissed IFCI Limited sought to reject Hotel Mythri's plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, arguing the civil court lacked jurisdiction due to Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The court dismissed IFCI's application, holding that rejection of plaint must be based solely on plaint averments. Since the plaint itself contains no averments showing the matter was previously adjudicated, and IFCI failed to produce the alleged Debts Recovery Tribunal order dismissing Hotel Mythri's earlier application (SA 174/2020), the court found insufficient grounds to bar the suit on jurisdictional grounds. The suit concerning the validity of a lease agreement under Section 65A of the Transfer of Property Act proceeded to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case