E.S. Shajikumar vs Kallara Grama Panchayath — 200009/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Await LCR. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLTV330000232018

Await LCR

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

200009/2018

Filing Date

27-01-2018

Registration No

200009/2018

Registration Date

27-01-2018

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 96
IA/2/2025 Classification : Prosecution Petition Section E.S. ShajikumarKallara Grama Panchayath
IA/3/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section E.S. ShajikumarKallara Grama Panchayath

Petitioner(s)

E.S. Shajikumar

Adv. P.Sreekumar

Respondent(s)

Kallara Grama Panchayath

Hassan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD

13-03-2026

Await LCR

15-01-2026

Declared Holidays

25-10-2025

Await LCR

06-08-2025

Await LCR

25-07-2025

For Orders

Interim Orders

06-08-2025
Order

Case Summary: E.S. Shajikumar v. Kallara Grama Panchayath (200009/2018) The court partially allowed the petitioner's injunction application. The respondent panchayath was temporarily restrained from committing waste, damage, or altering the disputed property's condition. Both parties were directed to maintain status quo as documented by the Advocate Commissioner's reports. The court declined to grant a blanket trespass injunction, finding the property's preservation sufficient for the pending appeal without pre-judging the trial court's dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: E.S. Shajikumar v. Kallara Grama Panchayath (200009/2018) The court partially allowed the petitioner's injunction application. The respondent panchayath was temporarily restrained from committing waste, damage, or altering the disputed property's condition. Both parties were directed to maintain status quo as documented by the Advocate Commissioner's reports. The court declined to grant a blanket trespass injunction, finding the property's preservation sufficient for the pending appeal without pre-judging the trial court's dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case