Excise Range Amaravila vs Vijayamma @ Thaththa Advocate - AL ANAND P, AL ANAND P, AL ANAND PAl, — 169/2025
Case under Abkari Act Section 55(I),8(1),8(2). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 25th April 2026.
CP - COMMITAL PROCEEDING
CNR: KLTV270082512025
Filing Number
4367/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
169/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3,Neyyattinkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
Excise Range Office Amaravila
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Excise Range Amaravila
Adv. VISHNU THAMPI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijayamma @ Thaththa Advocate - AL ANAND P, AL ANAND P, AL ANAND PAl,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate committed the case of Vijayamma, accused of illegally manufacturing arrack in violation of the Abkari Act (sections 8(1), 8(2), and 55(g)), to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram for trial. The court found that excise officers discovered 15 litres of arrack, 120 litres of wash, and manufacturing implements at the accused's residence, and determined the offences are exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions under section 232 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 169/2025
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate committed the case of Vijayamma, accused of illegally manufacturing arrack in violation of the Abkari Act (sections 8(1), 8(2), and 55(g)), to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram for trial. The court found that excise officers discovered 15 litres of arrack, 120 litres of wash, and manufacturing implements at the accused's residence, and determined the offences are exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions under section 232 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts