Excise Range Amaravila vs Vijayamma @ Thaththa Advocate - AL ANAND P, AL ANAND P, AL ANAND PAl, — 169/2025
Case under Abkari Act Section 55(I),8(1),8(2). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 25th April 2026.
CP - COMMITAL PROCEEDING
CNR: KLTV270082512025
Filing Number
4367/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
169/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3,Neyyattinkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
Excise Range Office Amaravila
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Excise Range Amaravila
Adv. VISHNU THAMPI
Respondent(s)
Vijayamma @ Thaththa Advocate - AL ANAND P, AL ANAND P, AL ANAND PAl,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
No sitting notified
Call on
Issue notice
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 26-03-2026 | Call on |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue notice |
| 12-02-2026 | Issue Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate committed the case of Vijayamma, accused of illegally manufacturing arrack in violation of the Abkari Act (sections 8(1), 8(2), and 55(g)), to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram for trial. The court found that excise officers discovered 15 litres of arrack, 120 litres of wash, and manufacturing implements at the accused's residence, and determined the offences are exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions under section 232 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate committed the case of Vijayamma, accused of illegally manufacturing arrack in violation of the Abkari Act (sections 8(1), 8(2), and 55(g)), to the Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram for trial. The court found that excise officers discovered 15 litres of arrack, 120 litres of wash, and manufacturing implements at the accused's residence, and determined the offences are exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions under section 232 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts