SHO Naruvamood PS vs Unni @ Sreejith S/o Sreekumar — 600136/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTV270001842020

Filing Number

600136/2020

Filing Date

04-Mar-2020

Registration No

600136/2020

Registration Date

04-Mar-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3,Neyyattinkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

621

Police Station

Naruvamoodu Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A)
Crl.mp(ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section SHO Naruvamood PSUnni @ Sreejith S/o Sreekumar
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section SHO Naruvamood PSUnni @ Sreejith S/o Sreekumar

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Naruvamood PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Unni @ Sreejith S/o Sreekumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted the accused Unni @ Sreejith of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and 304(A) (rash driving and causing death) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that key occurrence witnesses turned hostile, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's identity or presence at the accident scene, critical evidence (postmortem doctor and AMVI report examination) was absent, and no credible witness testified to how the accident occurred, making guilt impossible to establish beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 24-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 05-Nov-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 19-Jul-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 31-May-2025

    To record plea of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 30-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 14-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 11-Apr-2024

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 13-Sep-2023

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 21-Feb-2023

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 11-Oct-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 10-Jun-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 26-Apr-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 21-Dec-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 31-Aug-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 28-Jan-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 25-Jun-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 600136/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted the accused Unni @ Sreejith of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and 304(A) (rash driving and causing death) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that key occurrence witnesses turned hostile, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's identity or presence at the accident scene, critical evidence (postmortem doctor and AMVI report examination) was absent, and no credible witness testified to how the accident occurred, making guilt impossible to establish beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case