Devarajan vs Shibu Shanmugam — 401847/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTV250065662015
Filing Number
401847/2015
Filing Date
30-Oct-2015
Registration No
401847/2015
Registration Date
30-Oct-2015
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1, Neyyattinkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Devarajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shibu Shanmugam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Neyyattinkara acquitted Shibu Shanmugham of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that no legally enforceable debt existed between the parties. The court determined the complainant's claimed transaction date of February 30, 2013 was impossible, and questioned his financial capacity, thereby rebutting the statutory presumptions available to him. Although the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and statutory procedures were followed, the absence of a valid underlying debt—a critical ingredient of Section 138—made conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
12-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
27-Feb-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
23-Feb-2026
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
28-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
22-Dec-2025
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
19-Nov-2025
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
27-Oct-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
26-Sep-2025
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
22-Aug-2025
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
10-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
24-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
09-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
14-May-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
15-Apr-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
21-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
17-Feb-2025
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
11-Feb-2025
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
01-Jan-2025
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
17-Dec-2024
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
26-Nov-2024
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
08-Oct-2024
For hearing in Cmp
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
12-Jun-2024
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
12-Dec-2023
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
13-Nov-2023
Objection
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
28-Oct-2023
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
23-Sep-2023
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
19-Aug-2023
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
11-Jul-2023
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
06-Jul-2023
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
24-Jun-2023
Appearance Of Parties
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
05-Jun-2023
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
03-May-2023
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
10-Apr-2023
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
27-Jan-2023
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
09-Nov-2022
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
19-Sep-2022
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
01-Aug-2022
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
27-May-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
06-Jan-2022
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
08-Sep-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
05-Jun-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
17-Apr-2021
Issue summonsed to accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
22-Feb-2021
Issue summonsed to accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
14-May-2020
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
08-Nov-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
19-Oct-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
14-Aug-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
15-Mar-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
15-Jan-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
16-Jul-2018
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
18-Apr-2018
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
18-Jan-2018
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
18-Nov-2017
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
26-Aug-2017
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
07-Nov-2016
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
-
06-Feb-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 401847/2015
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Neyyattinkara acquitted Shibu Shanmugham of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that no legally enforceable debt existed between the parties. The court determined the complainant's claimed transaction date of February 30, 2013 was impossible, and questioned his financial capacity, thereby rebutting the statutory presumptions available to him. Although the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and statutory procedures were followed, the absence of a valid underlying debt—a critical ingredient of Section 138—made conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts