STATE OF KERALA (POLICE) vs Abdul Salam — 895/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 24th March 2026.
Cr.No(TVM-PS-Neyyattinkara) - Neyyattinkara Police Station
CNR: KLTV250017412025
Filing Number
694/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
895/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1, Neyyattinkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
694
Police Station
Neyyattinkara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF KERALA (POLICE)
Adv. Hari Krishnan V S
Respondent(s)
Abdul Salam
Anas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Neyyttinkara
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS
To summon witness
To summon witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS |
| 27-02-2026 | To summon witness |
| 16-02-2026 | To summon witness |
Interim Orders
The Neyyattinkara First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons (Abdul Salam and Anas) of theft charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding reasonable doubt regarding their identity and the prosecution's case. The court held that the case relied solely on a police-custody confession, which is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and the sole eyewitness could not identify the helmeted accused or describe their physical features. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Neyyattinkara First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons (Abdul Salam and Anas) of theft charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding reasonable doubt regarding their identity and the prosecution's case. The court held that the case relied solely on a police-custody confession, which is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and the sole eyewitness could not identify the helmeted accused or describe their physical features. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts