Sudhakaran vs Bensingh,Prop. Velamkannimatha Swa Mill and Furniture Advocate - SHIBUMON M S — 100700/2017

Case under Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 166. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

for evidence. Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP (MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLTV220009792017

Filing Number

807/2017

Filing Date

23-May-2017

Registration No

100700/2017

Registration Date

03-Jul-2017

Court

MACT , Neyyattinkara

Judge

1-MACT Neyyattinkara

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakaran

    Adv. Sri S. Murukan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bensingh,Prop. Velamkannimatha Swa Mill and Furniture Advocate - SHIBUMON M S

  2. 2.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. A Radhakrishnan

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  6. 17-Oct-2025

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  7. 27-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  9. 09-May-2025

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  10. 14-Mar-2025

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  11. 20-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  12. 21-Dec-2024

    Call on

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  13. 21-Dec-2024

    Restored

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  14. 21-Dec-2024

    Call on

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  15. 30-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Neyyattinkara dismissed the Original Petition (O.P. M.V. No. 700/2017) filed by Sudhakaran against Bensingh and New India Assurance Company Limited for default on 30th August 2024. The petition was dismissed as no evidence was adduced despite sufficient opportunity already being granted to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 30-Aug-2024

    Disposed

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  17. 01-Aug-2024

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  18. 20-Jul-2024

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  19. 01-Jun-2024

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  20. 07-May-2024

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  21. 11-Mar-2024

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  22. 26-Dec-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  23. 03-Nov-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  24. 16-Aug-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  25. 31-Jul-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  26. 22-Jun-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  27. 05-May-2023

    for evidence.

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  28. 21-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  29. 16-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  30. 26-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  31. 05-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  32. 13-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  33. 12-May-2021

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  34. 17-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  35. 23-Jul-2020

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  36. 18-Feb-2020

    Written Statement

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  37. 01-Aug-2019

    Issue notice

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  38. 14-Mar-2019

    Issue notice

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  39. 03-Oct-2018

    Issue notice

    MACT Neyyattinkara

  40. 13-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 23-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100700/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Neyyattinkara dismissed the Original Petition (O.P. M.V. No. 700/2017) filed by Sudhakaran against Bensingh and New India Assurance Company Limited for default on 30th August 2024. The petition was dismissed as no evidence was adduced despite sufficient opportunity already being granted to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case