Anil Gopinath vs Prema kumar Advocate - ANEES RASHEED B, Sareena S — 100187/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP(TP) - ORIGINAL PETITION (TRANSFER)

CNR: KLTV010078452024

e-Filing Number

30-11-2024

Filing Number

100487/2024

Filing Date

30-Nov-2024

Registration No

100187/2024

Registration Date

30-Nov-2024

Court

District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thiruvananthapuram

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Gopinath

    Adv. A.G.Syam kumar, A.G.Syam kumar, Sareena S, SANTHOSH S P, ASWATHY M S, Gayathri, simi u, Sai krishnan, GOWRI

  2. 2.Thara Nair

    Adv. A.G.Syam kumar,ANEES RASHEED B Sareena S SANTHOSH S P ASWATHY M S Gayathri simi u Sai krishnan GOWRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prema kumar Advocate - ANEES RASHEED B, Sareena S

  2. 2.Lalitha K

    Adv. ANEES RASHEED B,Sareena S

  3. 3.Elamkulam Sree Mahadeva Temple Trust

  4. 4.Swaminathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 100187/2024: The District Judge allowed a transfer petition filed under Section 24 CPC to consolidate two related property dispute suits. OS.No.533/2021 (pending before 1st Additional Munsiff Court) and OS.No.202/2021 (pending before 3rd Additional Munsiff Court) involved identical parties, subject matter (same Schedule B property), and likely evidence regarding prohibitory and mandatory injunctions. The court transferred OS.No.533/2021 to the 3rd Additional Munsiff Court to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting decisions, while noting that joint trial remains the trial court's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Return of notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  11. 21-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  12. 16-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Objection

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  14. 26-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  15. 21-Jan-2025

    Issue notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    Return of notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram

  17. 04-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 30-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100187/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 100187/2024: The District Judge allowed a transfer petition filed under Section 24 CPC to consolidate two related property dispute suits. OS.No.533/2021 (pending before 1st Additional Munsiff Court) and OS.No.202/2021 (pending before 3rd Additional Munsiff Court) involved identical parties, subject matter (same Schedule B property), and likely evidence regarding prohibitory and mandatory injunctions. The court transferred OS.No.533/2021 to the 3rd Additional Munsiff Court to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting decisions, while noting that joint trial remains the trial court's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case