Manikumar Ambadi vs Souparnika Project — 400060/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION26ORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN\ on 23rd May 2026.
CS - COMMERCIAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR420000752024
e-Filing Number
22-11-2024
Filing Number
400075/2024
Filing Date
23-11-2024
Registration No
400060/2024
Registration Date
23-11-2024
Court
Commercial Court, Chavakkad
Judge
1-Judge, Commercial Court
Decision Date
23rd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN\
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manikumar Ambadi
Adv. VINOJ K D
Respondent(s)
Souparnika Project
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, Commercial Court
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Referred to Mediator
For hearing on IA
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 20-05-2026 | Referred to Mediator |
| 19-05-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 16-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Manikumar Ambadi v. Souparnika Projects (IA 06/2026 in CS 60/2024) The Commercial Court, Chavakkad allowed Souparnika Projects' petition to lift the attachment of scheduled property under Order 38 Rule 9 CPC. The court granted the relief because the underlying suit was settled with the plaintiff's (Manikumar Ambadi's) consent, resulting in dismissal of the case. Consequently, the attachment order from IA 03/2024 was withdrawn and parties were instructed to communicate accordingly to the relevant registrar and village offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Manikumar Ambadi v. Souparnika Projects (IA 06/2026 in CS 60/2024) The Commercial Court, Chavakkad allowed Souparnika Projects' petition to lift the attachment of scheduled property under Order 38 Rule 9 CPC. The court granted the relief because the underlying suit was settled with the plaintiff's (Manikumar Ambadi's) consent, resulting in dismissal of the case. Consequently, the attachment order from IA 03/2024 was withdrawn and parties were instructed to communicate accordingly to the relevant registrar and village offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts