State of Kerala (Police) vs Suma — 4000727/2024
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act 2012 Section 22(1). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 22nd May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR400000312024
Filing Number
4000727/2024
Filing Date
01-07-2024
Registration No
4000727/2024
Registration Date
01-07-2024
Court
FTSC, Thrissur
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court (POCSO)
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
557
Police Station
TOWN EAST,THRISSUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor(POCSO)
Respondent(s)
Suma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court (POCSO)
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Call on
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 18-04-2026 | Call on |
| 31-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Suma (SC 727/2024) Suma, a 36-year-old woman, was acquitted of charges under Section 22(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (PoCSO) Act. The court found that she filed a complaint against two men (Balan and Chandran) alleging they sexually assaulted her daughter, but acted as a vigilant mother believing her children's account rather than with intent to frame them maliciously. The court determined the original complaint was based on a misunderstanding, as witness testimony established Suma had no direct knowledge of the alleged incident and only knew what her notoriously mischievous children told her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Suma (SC 727/2024) Suma, a 36-year-old woman, was acquitted of charges under Section 22(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (PoCSO) Act. The court found that she filed a complaint against two men (Balan and Chandran) alleging they sexually assaulted her daughter, but acted as a vigilant mother believing her children's account rather than with intent to frame them maliciously. The court determined the original complaint was based on a misunderstanding, as witness testimony established Suma had no direct knowledge of the alleged incident and only knew what her notoriously mischievous children told her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts