State of Kerala (Police) vs Jugal Thej Advocate - DEEPA P K — 645/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 332(b),64(20(m),75(1)(1),78(1)(1),65(1). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR400000252025
Filing Number
645/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
645/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2025
Court
FTSC, Thrissur
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court (POCSO)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1173
Police Station
ANTHIKKAD
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Public Prosecutor SUNILKUMAR K.B(PDC)
Respondent(s)
Jugal Thej Advocate - DEEPA P K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court (POCSO)
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For Examination of Witness
For production of accused
Issue production warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | For Examination of Witness |
| 06-03-2026 | For production of accused |
| 27-02-2026 | Issue production warrant |
Interim Orders
Case 645/2025 - Summary The Special Judge acquitted 18-year-old Jugal Thej of all charges under BNS sections 332(b), 67(2)(m), 75(1)(i),(ii), 65(1), and PoCSO Act sections 3(a), 4(2), 6(1), 7, 8, 11(iv), 12 for alleged rape and sexual assault of a 15-year-old survivor. The prosecution's case collapsed due to hostile witnesses—the survivor and her mother both recanted their initial allegations during trial, denying the alleged incidents occurred. With the key witnesses refusing to support the charges, the court found insufficient evidence to establish any nexus between the accused and the alleged offenses, resulting in acquittal under section 255 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 645/2025 - Summary The Special Judge acquitted 18-year-old Jugal Thej of all charges under BNS sections 332(b), 67(2)(m), 75(1)(i),(ii), 65(1), and PoCSO Act sections 3(a), 4(2), 6(1), 7, 8, 11(iv), 12 for alleged rape and sexual assault of a 15-year-old survivor. The prosecution's case collapsed due to hostile witnesses—the survivor and her mother both recanted their initial allegations during trial, denying the alleged incidents occurred. With the key witnesses refusing to support the charges, the court found insufficient evidence to establish any nexus between the accused and the alleged offenses, resulting in acquittal under section 255 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts