Sayeeda P.K vs Mohammed Hussain Advocate - ABDUL RASHID K — 39/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Call with Mp. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Call with Mp Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLTR360002082025

Filing Number

3600038/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

39/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

Gramanyayalaya, Mathilakam

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sayeeda P.K

    Adv. AYSHA E M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Hussain Advocate - ABDUL RASHID K

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP No.1/2026 IN MC 39/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Facts: Sayeeda P.K. sought monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 from her husband Mohammed Hussain under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming she received 90 tolas of gold jewelry as dowry which he misused in his real estate business, while she has no independent income. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's financial claims in her affidavit lack credibility. Court observed she possesses significant assets including 1/3 share in land/property (per S.R.O. 3453/2008), 1/3 share in an Ernakulam flat, and 1/3 share in Medicare Hospital stock generating monthly income—all concealed from the court. Referencing *Rajnesh v. Neha* (2020), the court held both parties must file truthful affidavits regarding assets. Without evidence, the petition cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Call with Mp

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  4. 18-May-2026

    Orders in IA

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Orders in IA

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  11. 31-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Objection

    Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

  15. 27-Nov-2025

    Interim OrderView PDF

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No.1/2026 IN MC 39/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Facts: Sayeeda P.K. sought monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 from her husband Mohammed Hussain under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming she received 90 tolas of gold jewelry as dowry which he misused in his real estate business, while she has no independent income. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's financial claims in her affidavit lack credibility. Court observed she possesses significant assets including 1/3 share in land/property (per S.R.O. 3453/2008), 1/3 share in an Ernakulam flat, and 1/3 share in Medicare Hospital stock generating monthly income—all concealed from the court. Referencing *Rajnesh v. Neha* (2020), the court held both parties must file truthful affidavits regarding assets. Without evidence, the petition cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case