Sayeeda P.K vs Mohammed Hussain Advocate - ABDUL RASHID K — 39/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Call with MP. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLTR360002082025

Call with MP

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

3600038/2025

Filing Date

27-11-2025

Registration No

39/2025

Registration Date

27-11-2025

Court

Gramanyayalaya, Mathilakam

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act Section 12
Crl.MP/404/2025 Classification : Petition Section Sayeeda P.K
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Sayeeda P.KMohammed Hussain
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Sayeeda P.KMohammed Hussain
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Sayeeda P.KMohammed Hussain

Petitioner(s)

Sayeeda P.K

Adv. AYSHA E M

Respondent(s)

Mohammed Hussain Advocate - ABDUL RASHID K

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari ,Gram Nyayalaya Mathilakam

20-05-2026

Call with MP

18-05-2026

Orders in IA

30-04-2026

Orders in IA

28-03-2026

FOR HEARING

16-03-2026

For further hearing

Interim Orders

27-11-2025
Interim Order
20-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: CMP No.1/2026 IN MC 39/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Facts: Sayeeda P.K. sought monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 from her husband Mohammed Hussain under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming she received 90 tolas of gold jewelry as dowry which he misused in his real estate business, while she has no independent income. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's financial claims in her affidavit lack credibility. Court observed she possesses significant assets including 1/3 share in land/property (per S.R.O. 3453/2008), 1/3 share in an Ernakulam flat, and 1/3 share in Medicare Hospital stock generating monthly income—all concealed from the court. Referencing *Rajnesh v. Neha* (2020), the court held both parties must file truthful affidavits regarding assets. Without evidence, the petition cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No.1/2026 IN MC 39/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. Facts: Sayeeda P.K. sought monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 from her husband Mohammed Hussain under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming she received 90 tolas of gold jewelry as dowry which he misused in his real estate business, while she has no independent income. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner's financial claims in her affidavit lack credibility. Court observed she possesses significant assets including 1/3 share in land/property (per S.R.O. 3453/2008), 1/3 share in an Ernakulam flat, and 1/3 share in Medicare Hospital stock generating monthly income—all concealed from the court. Referencing *Rajnesh v. Neha* (2020), the court held both parties must file truthful affidavits regarding assets. Without evidence, the petition cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Gramanyayalaya, Mathilakam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case