Rajeevan vs Jaleel V K Advocate - PRATHAPAN K N — 100180/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 28th March 2026.

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTR340001872025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-10-2023

Filing Number

1147/2025

Filing Date

16-10-2023

Registration No

100180/2023

Registration Date

16-10-2023

Court

JFCM II Kodungallur

Judge

1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138
Crl.MP/189/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Jaleel V KRajeevan
Crl.MP/194/2025 Classification : Bail Application Section Jaleel V KRajeevan
Crl.MP/195/2025 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section Jaleel V KRajeevan
Crl.MP/222/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section RajeevanJaleel V K
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : 205 Crpc Petition Section Jaleel V K
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Application to implead Section RajeevanJaleel V K
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Jaleel V K

Petitioner(s)

Rajeevan

Respondent(s)

Jaleel V K Advocate - PRATHAPAN K N

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR

28-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

No sitting notified

11-03-2026

Take steps last chance

06-02-2026

for evidence

06-01-2026

To record plea of the accused

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Order

The court dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (u/s 138 Negotiable Instrument Act) because the complainant had died and no legal heirs appeared to continue the case. The dismissal was ordered under Section 256 Cr.PC., with the accused's absence application being allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (u/s 138 Negotiable Instrument Act) because the complainant had died and no legal heirs appeared to continue the case. The dismissal was ordered under Section 256 Cr.PC., with the accused's absence application being allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFCM II Kodungallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case