Viswambaran vs Chandran Advocate - Adv. C.B. Rajeev — 102740/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 13th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR250035792017
Filing Number
102740/2017
Filing Date
21-08-2017
Registration No
102740/2017
Registration Date
21-08-2017
Court
JFCM Court, Kunnamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Viswambaran
Adv. T Nisar Ahammed
Respondent(s)
Chandran Advocate - Adv. C.B. Rajeev
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 07-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 06-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Viswambaran v. Chandran (CC 2740/2017) The court convicted Chandran under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant proved he lent this amount to the accused, who issued the cheque as repayment; the cheque bounced on 28.11.2013, and a demand notice sent on 27.12.2013 went unheeded. The accused's defense—claiming his roommate fraudulently used his cheque book while he was jailed—was rejected as unsubstantiated. Sentence: Four months simple imprisonment plus Rs. 20,00,000 compensation (with one additional month imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Viswambaran v. Chandran (CC 2740/2017) The court convicted Chandran under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 10,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant proved he lent this amount to the accused, who issued the cheque as repayment; the cheque bounced on 28.11.2013, and a demand notice sent on 27.12.2013 went unheeded. The accused's defense—claiming his roommate fraudulently used his cheque book while he was jailed—was rejected as unsubstantiated. Sentence: Four months simple imprisonment plus Rs. 20,00,000 compensation (with one additional month imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts