Salini vs Jithedran Advocate - SHANI K K, K Arun Kumar Kaimal, K Arun Kumar KaimalSona P Chacko,, K Arun Kumar KaimalSona P Chacko,Nerma K G,, K Arun Kumar KaimalSona P Chacko,Nerma K G,MOHAMMED RAYEES P A,, K Arun Kumar KaimalSona P Chacko,Nerma K G,MOHAMMED RAYEES P A,silgy p i,, K Arun Kumar KaimalSona P Chacko,Nerma K G,MOHAMMED RAYEES P A,silgy p i,SHANI K K, — 100064/2024

Case Summary: CMP 1/2026 (M.C. 64/2024) Outcome: Petition allowed. The court directed the respondent (Jithendran) to pay Rs. 15,000 monthly to each of his two children as interim maintenance. The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioner (Salini) under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, noting that the respondent admitted having sufficient means by acknowledging he pays educational expenses and various fees for the children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.