State of Kerala Police vs Arshad — 101269/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,145,148,323,324,341,149. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR250016312019

Filing Number

101269/2019

Filing Date

17-Aug-2019

Registration No

101269/2019

Registration Date

17-Aug-2019

Court

JFCM Court, Kunnamkulam

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

382

Police Station

VADAKKEKAD

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,145,148,323,324,341,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala Police

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arshad

  2. 2.Geevan

  3. 3.Jan

  4. 4.Amal Krishna

  5. 5.Ashil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Kunnamkulam Magistrate Court acquitted accused Arshad, Jeevan, Jan, and Ashil of charges including unlawful assembly, wrongful restraint, and assault (IPC §143, 145, 148, 341, 323, 324) after the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key witness (the alleged victim) was working abroad and did not appear, while three occurrence witnesses testified they had not witnessed the alleged assault, leading the court to conclude insufficient evidence existed against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 23-Aug-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 18-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 03-Jun-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 21-May-2025

    For appearance of accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 08-May-2025

    For appearance of accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    For appearance of accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 29-Jan-2025

    For appearance of accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 22-Jul-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 09-Jan-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 09-Oct-2023

    Reepeat summons to accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 04-Aug-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 20-Feb-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 20-Sep-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 11-Apr-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 31-Dec-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 06-Aug-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 22-Apr-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 12-Nov-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 02-Apr-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 14-Feb-2020

    Await summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 12-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 17-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101269/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Kunnamkulam Magistrate Court acquitted accused Arshad, Jeevan, Jan, and Ashil of charges including unlawful assembly, wrongful restraint, and assault (IPC §143, 145, 148, 341, 323, 324) after the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key witness (the alleged victim) was working abroad and did not appear, while three occurrence witnesses testified they had not witnessed the alleged assault, leading the court to conclude insufficient evidence existed against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case