BRD securities vs Shajith Advocate - Adv. Habeebulla — 102050/2016

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138NIACT. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTR250008912016

Filing Number

1033480/2016

Filing Date

18-May-2016

Registration No

102050/2016

Registration Date

18-May-2016

Court

JFCM Court, Kunnamkulam

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138NIACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRD securities

    Adv. Bindu P K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shajith Advocate - Adv. Habeebulla

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: S.T. 2050/2016 Court Decision: The accused, Shajith A.R., was acquitted under Section 255(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for the cheque dishonour offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the ₹50,000 cheque issued by the accused did not correspond to the legally enforceable debt. According to the kuri agreement, only 22 installments (totaling ₹33,000) were defaulted, not the full cheque amount. The court concluded the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt as claimed in the complaint, rebutting the statutory presumption against the complainant and warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 07-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 25-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 18-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 10-Apr-2026

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 07-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 31-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 23-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 19-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 07-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 05-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 25-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 19-Feb-2026

    For appearance of accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 11-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 09-Feb-2026

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 04-Feb-2026

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 31-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 29-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 22-Jan-2026

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 11-Dec-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 03-Dec-2025

    Further evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 21-Nov-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 07-Nov-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 31-Oct-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 29-Oct-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 20-Sep-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 10-Sep-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 28-Jun-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 05-Jun-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 04-Jun-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 07-May-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 02-Apr-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 26-Mar-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 18-Feb-2025

    Referred to Adalath

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 15-Feb-2025

    Referred to Adalath

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 14-Feb-2025

    Referred to Adalath

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 05-Feb-2025

    Referred to Adalath

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 29-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 01-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  47. 07-Dec-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  48. 13-Nov-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  49. 08-Nov-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  50. 19-Oct-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  51. 25-Sep-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  52. 11-Sep-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  53. 16-Aug-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  54. 08-Jul-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  55. 22-Jun-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  56. 10-Jun-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  57. 07-Jun-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  58. 27-May-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  59. 16-Feb-2024

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  60. 27-Oct-2023

    Issue Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  61. 22-Apr-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  62. 21-Feb-2023

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  63. 22-Sep-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  64. 12-Apr-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  65. 07-Sep-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  66. 10-May-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  67. 09-Apr-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  68. 09-Mar-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  69. 12-Feb-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  70. 16-Jan-2021

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  71. 19-Sep-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  72. 09-Jul-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  73. 29-May-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  74. 19-Dec-2019

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  75. 08-May-2019

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  76. 27-Oct-2018

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  77. 28-Apr-2018

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  78. 19-Oct-2017

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  79. 25-Feb-2017

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  80. 25-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  81. 18-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102050/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.T. 2050/2016 Court Decision: The accused, Shajith A.R., was acquitted under Section 255(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for the cheque dishonour offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the ₹50,000 cheque issued by the accused did not correspond to the legally enforceable debt. According to the kuri agreement, only 22 installments (totaling ₹33,000) were defaulted, not the full cheque amount. The court concluded the cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt as claimed in the complaint, rebutting the statutory presumption against the complainant and warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case