SI OF POLICE vs ISMAIL — 101486/2015
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,323,326,294(b). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 21st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR250008102015
Filing Number
1004079/2015
Filing Date
12-05-2015
Registration No
101486/2015
Registration Date
19-08-2015
Court
JFCM Court, Kunnamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
21st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE
Respondent(s)
ISMAIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
No sitting notified
Repeat summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-01-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 26-12-2025 | Repeat summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SI of Police v. Ismail (CC 1486/2015) The court acquitted Ismail of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, and 294(b) after finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical evidence came from the de facto complainant (PW1), who testified he sustained head injuries but explicitly stated the accused did not assault him; occurrence witnesses (PW2-3) also deposed they did not witness the alleged incident. The court concluded there were no incriminating circumstances against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SI of Police v. Ismail (CC 1486/2015) The court acquitted Ismail of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, and 294(b) after finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical evidence came from the de facto complainant (PW1), who testified he sustained head injuries but explicitly stated the accused did not assault him; occurrence witnesses (PW2-3) also deposed they did not witness the alleged incident. The court concluded there were no incriminating circumstances against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts