SML Finance vs Sarojini — 101725/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138NIACT. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 22nd May 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLTR250005692016
Filing Number
1033172/2016
Filing Date
22-Apr-2016
Registration No
101725/2016
Registration Date
22-Apr-2016
Court
JFCM Court, Kunnamkulam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SML Finance
Adv. MANOJ P S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarojini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
In this Section 138 NIACT (Negotiable Instruments Act) case, the JFCM Kunnamkulam allowed SML Finance's withdrawal application against respondent Sarojini, resulting in the accused's acquittal. The complainant's withdrawal of the case led to the dismissal of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-May-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Mar-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2025
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
For reports
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2025
For settlement
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2025
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
To record plea of the accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2025
For appearance of accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2025
For appearance of accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2024
For appearance of accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2024
For appearance of accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2024
For appearance of accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2024
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-May-2024
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2023
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2023
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2023
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2022
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-May-2022
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2021
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-May-2021
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2020
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2020
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2020
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2019
Issue summonsed to accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2019
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2019
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2018
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2017
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2017
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2016
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2016
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 101725/2016
In this Section 138 NIACT (Negotiable Instruments Act) case, the JFCM Kunnamkulam allowed SML Finance's withdrawal application against respondent Sarojini, resulting in the accused's acquittal. The complainant's withdrawal of the case led to the dismissal of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts