MUSTHAFA N M vs JAYAN P V — 4309/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLTR240058852025

Filing Number

44453/2025

Filing Date

25-Oct-2025

Registration No

4309/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTHAFA N M

    Adv. NIMISHA U

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYAN P V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Wadakkanchery First Class Magistrate dismissed Musthafa N M's complaint against Jayan P V under Section 226 of BNSS, finding no criminal grounds for prosecution. The court reasoned that the complaint was based on the accused's alleged failure to comply with a civil agreement regarding compensation for property damage from quarrying operations, rather than on a criminal act itself, and that any illegal mining matters should be addressed by Mining and Geology Department and revenue authorities, not criminal courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4309/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Wadakkanchery First Class Magistrate dismissed Musthafa N M's complaint against Jayan P V under Section 226 of BNSS, finding no criminal grounds for prosecution. The court reasoned that the complaint was based on the accused's alleged failure to comply with a civil agreement regarding compensation for property damage from quarrying operations, rather than on a criminal act itself, and that any illegal mining matters should be addressed by Mining and Geology Department and revenue authorities, not criminal courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case