State of Kerala (Police) vs Aneesh Advocate - MUHAMMED FAHIZ — 2802/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 18th March 2026.
Cr.No.(TSR-PS-Medical College) - Medical College Station Mulamkunnathkavu
CNR: KLTR240048122025
e-Filing Number
07-09-2025
Filing Number
720/2025
Filing Date
18-09-2025
Registration No
2802/2025
Registration Date
27-09-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
720
Police Station
Medical College Station Mulamkunnathukavu
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Aneesh Advocate - MUHAMMED FAHIZ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Repeat Summons
Repeat Summons
Repeat Summons
Repeat Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 31-01-2026 | Repeat Summons |
| 19-12-2025 | Repeat Summons |
| 28-10-2025 | Repeat Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Wadakkanchery Magistrate Court convicted Aneesh of Kollankode Village on charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (rash/negligent driving) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash act endangering life). The accused pleaded guilty through counsel and was sentenced to pay Rs. 10,000 fine (40 days imprisonment in default) for the motor vehicle offense and Rs. 100 fine (2 days imprisonment in default) for the rash act offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Wadakkanchery Magistrate Court convicted Aneesh of Kollankode Village on charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (rash/negligent driving) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash act endangering life). The accused pleaded guilty through counsel and was sentenced to pay Rs. 10,000 fine (40 days imprisonment in default) for the motor vehicle offense and Rs. 100 fine (2 days imprisonment in default) for the rash act offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts