SIP vs ADITTO Advocate - K. Sajith Kumar — 201269/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,354,34. Status: Issue NBW. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR240033702019

Issue NBW

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

201269/2019

Filing Date

21-12-2019

Registration No

201269/2019

Registration Date

21-12-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

273

Police Station

ERUMAPETTY

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,354,34
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Today Moving Petition Section SIPADITTO
Crl.mp/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section SIPADITTO

Petitioner(s)

SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)

Respondent(s)

ADITTO Advocate - K. Sajith Kumar

DIJO

Adv. K. Sajith Kumar

DEVASSY

Adv. K. Sajith Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

19-05-2026

Issue NBW

20-04-2026

Await warrent

16-03-2026

To summon witness

03-02-2026

Adjourned

01-01-2026

Issue bailable warrant to witness

Interim Orders

10-06-2026
Order

Case Summary: CMP No. 02/2026 in CC 1269/2019 Outcome: Petition allowed. The Wadakkanchery First Class Magistrate permitted the accused (Ditto, age 34) to apply for passport renewal/reissuance for three years. The court held that pending criminal charges (IPC §341, 323, 324, 354) alone cannot deny passport rights, particularly when no formal travel restriction exists and trial commencement appears distant. The Regional Passport Officer must consider his application upon submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP No. 02/2026 in CC 1269/2019 Outcome: Petition allowed. The Wadakkanchery First Class Magistrate permitted the accused (Ditto, age 34) to apply for passport renewal/reissuance for three years. The court held that pending criminal charges (IPC §341, 323, 324, 354) alone cannot deny passport rights, particularly when no formal travel restriction exists and trial commencement appears distant. The Regional Passport Officer must consider his application upon submission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case