State of Kerala Police vs Riyas — 201576/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,324,294(b),427r/w34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 25th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR240019402014
Filing Number
201576/2014
Filing Date
22-07-2014
Registration No
201576/2014
Registration Date
22-07-2014
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
458
Police Station
ERUMAPETTY
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Aboobacker@Baker
Respondent(s)
Riyas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 23-02-2026 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 1576/2014 Court Decision: Both accused (Riyas and Aboobacker @ Bakker) were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 448, 323, 324, 294(b), and 427 r/w 34. Their bail bonds were cancelled and they were set at liberty. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case relied primarily on testimony from the two complainants (PW1 and PW2), who initially corroborated allegations of criminal trespass, assault, obscene language, and property damage. However, during cross-examination, both witnesses turned hostile and retracted their statements, claiming the matter was settled due to misunderstanding and they no longer wished to proceed. The court found the complainants' contradictory evidence fatal to the prosecution's case and concluded the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 1576/2014 Court Decision: Both accused (Riyas and Aboobacker @ Bakker) were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 448, 323, 324, 294(b), and 427 r/w 34. Their bail bonds were cancelled and they were set at liberty. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case relied primarily on testimony from the two complainants (PW1 and PW2), who initially corroborated allegations of criminal trespass, assault, obscene language, and property damage. However, during cross-examination, both witnesses turned hostile and retracted their statements, claiming the matter was settled due to misunderstanding and they no longer wished to proceed. The court found the complainants' contradictory evidence fatal to the prosecution's case and concluded the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts