SIP vs SHANAVAS — 200228/2020
Case under Ipc \ Section 427,447,294(B),506(1),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR240006152020
Filing Number
200228/2020
Filing Date
11-03-2020
Registration No
200228/2020
Registration Date
11-03-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
CHERUTHURUTHY
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)
Respondent(s)
SHANAVAS
SAIDALAVI @ ALI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Issue bailable warrant to witness
NBW to cws
Issue Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-01-2026 | Issue bailable warrant to witness |
| 11-11-2025 | NBW to cws |
| 09-09-2025 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 228/2020 The Wadakkanchery Magistrate's Court acquitted accused Shanavas and Saidalavi @ Ali of charges under IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution alleged the accused criminally trespassed into the complainant's courtyard, uttered obscene words, threatened him, and damaged property worth Rs. 4,600. However, the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) turned hostile, admitted inability to identify the actual assailants, and disclosed the matter had been settled between parties. The court found no incriminating material and acquitted both accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 228/2020 The Wadakkanchery Magistrate's Court acquitted accused Shanavas and Saidalavi @ Ali of charges under IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution alleged the accused criminally trespassed into the complainant's courtyard, uttered obscene words, threatened him, and damaged property worth Rs. 4,600. However, the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) turned hostile, admitted inability to identify the actual assailants, and disclosed the matter had been settled between parties. The court found no incriminating material and acquitted both accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts