SIP vs SHANAVAS — 200228/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 427,447,294(B),506(1),34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR240006152020

Filing Number

200228/2020

Filing Date

11-Mar-2020

Registration No

200228/2020

Registration Date

11-Mar-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

CHERUTHURUTHY

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 427,447,294(B),506(1),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANAVAS

  2. 2.SAIDALAVI @ ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: CC 228/2020 The Wadakkanchery Magistrate's Court acquitted accused Shanavas and Saidalavi @ Ali of charges under IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution alleged the accused criminally trespassed into the complainant's courtyard, uttered obscene words, threatened him, and damaged property worth Rs. 4,600. However, the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) turned hostile, admitted inability to identify the actual assailants, and disclosed the matter had been settled between parties. The court found no incriminating material and acquitted both accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 18-Jul-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 18-Mar-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 05-Dec-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 30-Nov-2024

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 16-Nov-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 28-Oct-2024

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 05-Oct-2024

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 12-Sep-2024

    Await Village Officer's Certificate

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 24-Jun-2024

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 15-Mar-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 06-Feb-2024

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 05-Oct-2023

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 04-Jul-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 17-Apr-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 14-Apr-2023

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 22-Nov-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 04-Apr-2022

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 22-Nov-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 15-Mar-2021

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 04-Nov-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 08-May-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200228/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 228/2020 The Wadakkanchery Magistrate's Court acquitted accused Shanavas and Saidalavi @ Ali of charges under IPC sections 447, 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution alleged the accused criminally trespassed into the complainant's courtyard, uttered obscene words, threatened him, and damaged property worth Rs. 4,600. However, the sole prosecution witness (the complainant) turned hostile, admitted inability to identify the actual assailants, and disclosed the matter had been settled between parties. The court found no incriminating material and acquitted both accused under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case