Sarala vs Sankaran M B Advocate - Manoj N S — 456/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,7. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR230008882025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

1164/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

456/2025

Registration Date

25-11-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,7
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Urgent Application Section SaralaSankaran M B
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section SaralaSankaran M B
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section SaralaSankaran M B

Petitioner(s)

Sarala

Adv. Radhika.M

Respondent(s)

Sankaran M B Advocate - Manoj N S

Rajan K

Adv. Manoj N S

Sreedevi

Adv. Manoj N S

Anish

Adv. Manoj N S

Sushama

Adv. Manoj N S

Hariharan

Adv. Manoj N S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

16-03-2026

Written Statement

16-12-2025

Written Statement

15-12-2025

Orders in IA

12-12-2025

For hearing on IA

25-11-2025

Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons

Interim Orders

15-12-2025
Order

Case Summary: Sarala v. Sankaran M B Advocate & Others (OS 456/2025) Outcome: Plaintiff Sarala's application for temporary injunction was dismissed by the Court of Munsiff, Wadakanchery on December 15, 2025. The court found insufficient prima facie case, noting defects in pleadings (lack of fundamental requirements for adverse possession claim), weak documentary evidence (possession certificate from 1993, tax receipts ending 2018), non-joinder of the temple as defendant despite plaintiff's admission it is the actual owner, and failure to prove current possession. The balance of convenience favored defendants as a temple festival (Niramala ceremony) was scheduled. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sarala v. Sankaran M B Advocate & Others (OS 456/2025) Outcome: Plaintiff Sarala's application for temporary injunction was dismissed by the Court of Munsiff, Wadakanchery on December 15, 2025. The court found insufficient prima facie case, noting defects in pleadings (lack of fundamental requirements for adverse possession claim), weak documentary evidence (possession certificate from 1993, tax receipts ending 2018), non-joinder of the temple as defendant despite plaintiff's admission it is the actual owner, and failure to prove current possession. The balance of convenience favored defendants as a temple festival (Niramala ceremony) was scheduled. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case