Shaji vs Muhammed — 100229/2019

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 26th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR230004362019

Case disposed

Filing Number

100229/2019

Filing Date

29-05-2019

Registration No

100229/2019

Registration Date

29-05-2019

Court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7
Ia/1543/2019 Classification : Petition Section ShajiMuhammed
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Section MuhammedShaji
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition to Set Aside Order / Decree Section MuhammedShaji

Petitioner(s)

Shaji

Adv. Maheswaran VP

Respondent(s)

Muhammed

Ayisha

Rafeeq

Thoufeeq

Shefeeq

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

26-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

24-03-2026

For evidence

23-03-2026

With connected case

19-03-2026

Call on

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: O.S. 229/2019 - Shaji v. Muhammed & Others The Munsiff court decreed Shaji's injunction suit, accepting his testimony that he legally purchased the property via deed No. 1078/2015 and holds exclusive possession. The court rejected defendants' claims that the deed was fraudulent, finding their contentions unproven and the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence credible. The court permanently restrained defendants from trespassing on or interfering with the property and awarded costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-07-2025
Judgement
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 229/2019 - Shaji v. Muhammed & Others The Munsiff court decreed Shaji's injunction suit, accepting his testimony that he legally purchased the property via deed No. 1078/2015 and holds exclusive possession. The court rejected defendants' claims that the deed was fraudulent, finding their contentions unproven and the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence credible. The court permanently restrained defendants from trespassing on or interfering with the property and awarded costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case