Manikandan vs Badharudeen Advocate - Sajith, Ambili S Nair — 67/2026

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule 1. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

No sitting notified Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR230000992026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan

    Adv. Biju Joseph Edakkalathur, Biju Joseph Edakkalathur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Badharudeen Advocate - Sajith, Ambili S Nair

  2. 2.Kerala State Rep by District Collector Thrissur

  3. 3.Tahasildar Talappilly Taluk Wadakanchery

  4. 4.Village Officer Wadakanchery

  5. 5.Wadakanchery Muncipality Rep by Secretary

  6. 6.Wadakanchery Muncipality

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Issue notice

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. 67/2026 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED in favor of plaintiff Manikandan. The Munsiff's Court restrained defendant Badarudheen from continuing any construction activity in his property until either the suit is disposed or a concrete retaining wall is constructed to replace the deteriorating old mud-and-stone wall separating the two properties. The court found a prima facie case that the defendant's construction work was destabilizing the boundary retaining wall, posing threats to the plaintiff's property and life in a landslide-prone hilly area. Balance of convenience favored the plaintiff given documented land-sliding incidents in the locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    For Counter

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  12. 28-Feb-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 67/2026 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED in favor of plaintiff Manikandan. The Munsiff's Court restrained defendant Badarudheen from continuing any construction activity in his property until either the suit is disposed or a concrete retaining wall is constructed to replace the deteriorating old mud-and-stone wall separating the two properties. The court found a prima facie case that the defendant's construction work was destabilizing the boundary retaining wall, posing threats to the plaintiff's property and life in a landslide-prone hilly area. Balance of convenience favored the plaintiff given documented land-sliding incidents in the locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case