SIP vs Lonappan Advocate - Poly Ambooken — 101008/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,506i. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 19th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR220017742017
Filing Number
101008/2017
Filing Date
10-04-2017
Registration No
101008/2017
Registration Date
10-04-2017
Court
JFCM, Chalakudy
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
VARANDARAPPILLY
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)
Respondent(s)
Lonappan Advocate - Poly Ambooken
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Defence Evidence
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 101008/2017 Summary The Chalakudy Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Lonappan of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, and 506(i) (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt with weapon, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient: the main injured witness's testimony remained incomplete and uncross-examined; the mahazar witness turned hostile; and no independent corroborating evidence connected the accused to the alleged assault. The accused was discharged from bail and set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 101008/2017 Summary The Chalakudy Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Lonappan of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, and 506(i) (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt with weapon, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient: the main injured witness's testimony remained incomplete and uncross-examined; the mahazar witness turned hostile; and no independent corroborating evidence connected the accused to the alleged assault. The accused was discharged from bail and set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts