SI of Police, Chalakudy vs Jose — 100124/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(a)1(3),354(A)(1)(4),294(b). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR220004902019

Filing Number

100124/2019

Filing Date

05-Feb-2019

Registration No

100124/2019

Registration Date

05-Feb-2019

Court

JFCM, Chalakudy

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

827

Police Station

CHALAKUDY

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354(a)1(3),354(A)(1)(4),294(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, Chalakudy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jose

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Summary The Chalakudy Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Jose of charges under IPC Sections 354A(1)(iii), 354A(1)(iv), and 294(b), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified material contradictions in the complainant's testimony (regarding incident timing), an unexplained 4-day delay in filing the FIR, and evidence of an underlying civil property dispute, concluding the allegations appeared motivated by enmity rather than genuine criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 11-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 25-Jun-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 21-May-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 21-May-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 29-Apr-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 10-Apr-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 18-Mar-2025

    Bound over

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 24-Feb-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 14-Jan-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 18-Dec-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 11-Nov-2024

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 03-Oct-2024

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 17-Jul-2024

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 09-May-2024

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 13-Mar-2024

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 24-Jan-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 26-Dec-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 06-Oct-2023

    Bound over

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 04-Jul-2023

    For cross examination.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 18-May-2023

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 27-Apr-2023

    Report on mediation

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 13-Dec-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 28-Nov-2022

    Report on mediation

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 15-Nov-2022

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 03-Sep-2022

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 13-May-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 21-Jan-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  47. 01-Oct-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  48. 01-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  49. 14-Jun-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  50. 02-Mar-2021

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  51. 19-Nov-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  52. 05-Jun-2020

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  53. 10-Mar-2020

    Appearance of Petitioner

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  54. 05-Dec-2019

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  55. 25-Oct-2019

    For hearing Ea

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  56. 24-Sep-2019

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  57. 22-Jul-2019

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  58. 04-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 05-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100124/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chalakudy Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Jose of charges under IPC Sections 354A(1)(iii), 354A(1)(iv), and 294(b), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified material contradictions in the complainant's testimony (regarding incident timing), an unexplained 4-day delay in filing the FIR, and evidence of an underlying civil property dispute, concluding the allegations appeared motivated by enmity rather than genuine criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case