SI of Police, Chalakudy vs Arun Kumar @ Arun — 100031/2019
Case under Ipc \ Section 143,148,332,149. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 25th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR220001642019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100031/2019
Filing Date
15-01-2019
Registration No
100031/2019
Registration Date
15-01-2019
Court
JFCM, Chalakudy
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
756
Police Station
CHALAKUDY
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Chalakudy
Respondent(s)
Arun Kumar @ Arun
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 11-03-2026 | For further hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chalakudy Magistrate Court acquitted all six accused persons charged with unlawful assembly, rioting with deadly weapons, and assaulting police officers. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence: the police witnesses failed to identify the accused in court, no independent witnesses were examined despite the crowded location, and the FIR contained unexplained corrections regarding time and place. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly or committed the alleged offences, thereby entitling them to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chalakudy Magistrate Court acquitted all six accused persons charged with unlawful assembly, rioting with deadly weapons, and assaulting police officers. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's evidence: the police witnesses failed to identify the accused in court, no independent witnesses were examined despite the crowded location, and the FIR contained unexplained corrections regarding time and place. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly or committed the alleged offences, thereby entitling them to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts