Divine ventures vs Mini mol Poly Advocate - GOPI.C.K — 100523/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 30th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR210009262018
Filing Number
100523/2018
Filing Date
03-08-2018
Registration No
100523/2018
Registration Date
03-08-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Chalakudy
Judge
1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Divine ventures
Adv. JAYATHI R, JAYATHI R
Respondent(s)
Mini mol Poly Advocate - GOPI.C.K
Poly
Adv. Osto Paul
Mary Lonappan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Verify and report
Call on
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Verify and report |
| 16-03-2026 | Call on |
| 06-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Divine Ventures v. Mini Mol Poly Advocate (O.S. 523/2018) The Munsiff Court of Chalakudy decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,79,780 (principal Rs. 2,80,000 plus interest) against defendants for defaulting on a chitty (rotating savings scheme) subscription. The court found that defendants 1 and 2 validly participated in kuri FM 16, received advances and full amount, but defaulted after 32 installments, and dismissed limitation and authenticity challenges to documents despite defendant's evasive denials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Divine Ventures v. Mini Mol Poly Advocate (O.S. 523/2018) The Munsiff Court of Chalakudy decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 3,79,780 (principal Rs. 2,80,000 plus interest) against defendants for defaulting on a chitty (rotating savings scheme) subscription. The court found that defendants 1 and 2 validly participated in kuri FM 16, received advances and full amount, but defaulted after 32 installments, and dismissed limitation and authenticity challenges to documents despite defendant's evasive denials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts