Metro Bankers Rep by POA Cum Assist Manager Sreejith vs Reji Kuriakkose — 435/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule I. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed as not Pressed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR210008982025

Filing Number

873/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

435/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Chalakudy

Judge

1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed as not Pressed

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule I

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Metro Bankers Rep by POA Cum Assist Manager Sreejith

    Adv. WILSON JOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Reji Kuriakkose

  2. 2.Kuriakkose

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: In O.S.435/2025 before the Munsiff Court, Chalakudy, Metro Bankers filed a suit against Reji Kuriyakose and Kuriyakose. On March 24, 2026, the court dismissed the suit as "not pressed" because the plaintiff's counsel failed to press the case during the hearing despite the plaintiff being represented in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 435/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In O.S.435/2025 before the Munsiff Court, Chalakudy, Metro Bankers filed a suit against Reji Kuriyakose and Kuriyakose. On March 24, 2026, the court dismissed the suit as "not pressed" because the plaintiff's counsel failed to press the case during the hearing despite the plaintiff being represented in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case