Anuraj K Ecomark General Finance and Leasing Limited vs Thankamani — 100315/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 7, Order 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 26th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR210006792025
e-Filing Number
07-07-2025
Filing Number
706/2025
Filing Date
11-07-2025
Registration No
100315/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Chalakudy
Judge
1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anuraj K Ecomark General Finance and Leasing Limited
Adv. GIREESH KUMAR P A
Respondent(s)
Thankamani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
exparte evidence
exparte evidence
For Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | exparte evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | exparte evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | For Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S. 315/2025 The Munsiff Court Chalakudy decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 9,551/- against defendants Thankamani and Siji Mohinder, who defaulted on a personal loan of Rs. 15,000/- sanctioned in December 2020. The defendants repaid only up to the 36th installment (July 2022) and subsequently defaulted; the court found the plaintiff's evidence unchallenged and awarded interest at 12% per annum from suit date to decree, thereafter 6% per annum, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed exorbitant rate of 23% per month. Suit costs were also awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 315/2025 The Munsiff Court Chalakudy decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 9,551/- against defendants Thankamani and Siji Mohinder, who defaulted on a personal loan of Rs. 15,000/- sanctioned in December 2020. The defendants repaid only up to the 36th installment (July 2022) and subsequently defaulted; the court found the plaintiff's evidence unchallenged and awarded interest at 12% per annum from suit date to decree, thereafter 6% per annum, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed exorbitant rate of 23% per month. Suit costs were also awarded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts