Viji vs Thrissur District Collector — 100181/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR210003922025

e-Filing Number

09-04-2025

Filing Number

407/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

100181/2025

Registration Date

19-May-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Chalakudy

Judge

1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Viji

    Adv. PRIYAMOL C P

  2. 2.Viji Represented for her brother Reji

    Adv. PRIYAMOL C P,PRIYAMOL PRIYAMOL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thrissur District Collector

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  6. 15-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of CPC by Viji and Reji seeking temporary injunction to protect a 40-year-old boundary wall from demolition by the Kerala Government (PWD) has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners had encroached 0.0196 hectares of puramboke (government) land as per proper digital survey measurements, and the government followed due procedure under the Kerala Highway Protection Act before issuing the demolition notice dated 27.01.2025; since there is no prima facie case for temporary injunction, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 25-Jun-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  12. 16-Jun-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of CPC by Viji and Reji seeking temporary injunction to protect a 40-year-old boundary wall from demolition by the Kerala Government (PWD) has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners had encroached 0.0196 hectares of puramboke (government) land as per proper digital survey measurements, and the government followed due procedure under the Kerala Highway Protection Act before issuing the demolition notice dated 27.01.2025; since there is no prima facie case for temporary injunction, the petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case