Alice vs Asst.Executive Engineer — 100088/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed without Cost on 08th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR210002362023
Filing Number
235/2023
Filing Date
21-02-2023
Registration No
100088/2023
Registration Date
21-02-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Chalakudy
Judge
1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed without Cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alice
Adv. P.P.Peeter
Respondent(s)
Asst.Executive Engineer
Executive Engineer
Distirct Collector rep. for Kerala Government
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff and J F C M II,Chalakudy
Disposed
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For Counter in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | For Counter in IA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.88/2023 - Alice v. Asst. Executive Engineer and Others The Munsiff Court dismissed Alice's suit seeking mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunctions to remove an irrigation pipeline from her property. The court found that Alice failed to prove the pipeline was installed without her predecessor's consent. Although Alice claimed she discovered the pipe only when excavating soil in 2019 and denied giving permission, the defendants (Kerala Minor Irrigation Department) presented evidence that the Kannankuzhi Lift Irrigation Scheme pipeline was installed with prior owner consent in 1988 for a public welfare project benefiting 108 SC-ST families. The court ruled that because Alice produced no evidence contradicting the government's assertion of prior consent, she could not establish her entitlement to the injunctions, resulting in dismissal with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.88/2023 - Alice v. Asst. Executive Engineer and Others The Munsiff Court dismissed Alice's suit seeking mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunctions to remove an irrigation pipeline from her property. The court found that Alice failed to prove the pipeline was installed without her predecessor's consent. Although Alice claimed she discovered the pipe only when excavating soil in 2019 and denied giving permission, the defendants (Kerala Minor Irrigation Department) presented evidence that the Kannankuzhi Lift Irrigation Scheme pipeline was installed with prior owner consent in 1988 for a public welfare project benefiting 108 SC-ST families. The court ruled that because Alice produced no evidence contradicting the government's assertion of prior consent, she could not establish her entitlement to the injunctions, resulting in dismissal with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts