SIP Kodungallur vs Anitha Khader — 202713/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,427,294(b),506,34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTR200044232017

Filing Number

202713/2017

Filing Date

19-Oct-2017

Registration No

202713/2017

Registration Date

19-Oct-2017

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Magistrate Kodungallur

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1154

Police Station

KODUNGALLUR

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 447,427,294(b),506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police) Kodungallur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anitha Khader

  2. 2.Muhammed Ashkar A A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: ST. 2713/2017 Court Decision: The court acquitted Anitha Khader and Muhammed Ashkar of all charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 427 (mischief), 294(b) (obscene language), and 506 (criminal intimidation) r/w 34 (common intention). The court found material omissions between the initial complaint and courtroom testimony, an unexplained 12-day delay in lodging the complaint, and absence of independent corroboration, creating reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  14. 05-Nov-2025

    For Examination of Witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    Further evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  18. 06-Aug-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  20. 10-Jun-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  21. 07-May-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  22. 26-Mar-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  23. 24-Feb-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  24. 16-Jan-2025

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  25. 26-Dec-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  26. 24-Dec-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  27. 10-Dec-2024

    Bound over

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  28. 06-Nov-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  29. 11-Sep-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  30. 24-Jul-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  31. 28-Jun-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  32. 13-May-2024

    Notice in Ca

  33. 03-Apr-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  34. 09-Feb-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  35. 10-Jan-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  36. 24-Nov-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  37. 26-Oct-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  38. 18-Sep-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  39. 31-Jul-2023

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  40. 30-Jun-2023

    Appearance of Accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  41. 08-May-2023

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  42. 22-Mar-2023

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  43. 17-Feb-2023

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  44. 30-Dec-2022

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  45. 07-Nov-2022

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  46. 13-Sep-2022

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  47. 20-Jul-2022

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  48. 20-May-2022

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  49. 17-Jan-2022

    for evidence.

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  50. 08-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  51. 30-Apr-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  52. 20-Feb-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  53. 04-Jan-2021

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  54. 06-Oct-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  55. 04-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  56. 12-Feb-2020

    To record plea of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  57. 06-Jan-2020

    To record plea of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  58. 28-Sep-2019

    To record plea of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  59. 01-Jun-2019

    To record plea of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  60. 06-Feb-2019

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  61. 03-Dec-2018

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  62. 03-Oct-2018

    Accused absent applys.

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  63. 19-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 19-Oct-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202713/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST. 2713/2017 Court Decision: The court acquitted Anitha Khader and Muhammed Ashkar of all charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 427 (mischief), 294(b) (obscene language), and 506 (criminal intimidation) r/w 34 (common intention). The court found material omissions between the initial complaint and courtroom testimony, an unexplained 12-day delay in lodging the complaint, and absence of independent corroboration, creating reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case