State of Kerala (Police) vs Ramankutty — 201025/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),118(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 25th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR200041252024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2002066/2024
Filing Date
13-09-2024
Registration No
201025/2024
Registration Date
13-09-2024
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
763
Police Station
VALAPPAD
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst Public Prosecutor(JFCM,Kodungallur)
Respondent(s)
Ramankutty
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Defence Evidence
Further evidence
Report on mediation
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 11-03-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 20-01-2026 | Report on mediation | |
| 27-10-2025 | No sitting notified |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Kodungallur First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Raman Kutty of charges under BNS 2023 sections 85, 115(2), and 118(1) (involving domestic harassment and causing hurt) on March 25, 2026. The complainant (PW1), his wife, testified that disagreements were resolved through mediation and she had no further complaint against the accused, rendering the prosecution unable to establish guilt. The court found no material evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offence and set him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Kodungallur First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Raman Kutty of charges under BNS 2023 sections 85, 115(2), and 118(1) (involving domestic harassment and causing hurt) on March 25, 2026. The complainant (PW1), his wife, testified that disagreements were resolved through mediation and she had no further complaint against the accused, rendering the prosecution unable to establish guilt. The court found no material evidence connecting the accused to the alleged offence and set him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts