SIP vs Majeed — 202204/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLTR200039932019

Filing Number

202204/2019

Filing Date

05-Oct-2019

Registration No

202204/2019

Registration Date

05-Oct-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Magistrate Kodungallur

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

434

Police Station

VALAPPAD

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicle Act \ Section 134r/w187

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Majeed

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    In case ST 202204/2019 before the JFCM Kodungallur, the court acquitted respondent Majeed of charges under Section 134 r/w 187 of the Motor Vehicle Act and Sections 279, 337, 338 of the IPC. The acquittal was ordered under Section 255(1) of CRPC on the grounds that the accused, though represented, presented no defense evidence and the prosecution evidence was insufficient to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  4. 14-May-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  11. 07-May-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  12. 11-Mar-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  13. 03-Feb-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  14. 11-Dec-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  15. 16-Oct-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  18. 02-May-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  19. 20-Mar-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  20. 22-Jan-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  21. 08-Nov-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  22. 13-Sep-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  23. 11-Jul-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  24. 31-Mar-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  25. 11-Jan-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  26. 14-Sep-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  27. 11-Jul-2022

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  28. 16-Apr-2022

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  29. 14-Apr-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  30. 15-Dec-2021

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  31. 25-Aug-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  32. 25-May-2021

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  33. 25-Feb-2021

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  34. 22-Feb-2021

    Issue NBW

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  35. 19-Jan-2021

    Issue Summons

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  36. 16-Oct-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  37. 23-Jul-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  38. 28-Mar-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  39. 09-Dec-2019

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  40. 28-Nov-2019

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  41. 09-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 05-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202204/2019

casestatus.in Summary

In case ST 202204/2019 before the JFCM Kodungallur, the court acquitted respondent Majeed of charges under Section 134 r/w 187 of the Motor Vehicle Act and Sections 279, 337, 338 of the IPC. The acquittal was ordered under Section 255(1) of CRPC on the grounds that the accused, though represented, presented no defense evidence and the prosecution evidence was insufficient to prove the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case