S.I vs Jithukrishna — 200398/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR200015592020

Filing Number

200398/2020

Filing Date

28-Apr-2020

Registration No

200398/2020

Registration Date

15-May-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Magistrate Kodungallur

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jithukrishna

  2. 2.Riswan

  3. 3.Shameer

  4. 4.Sheyinsha

  5. 5.Fayis

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Kodungallur Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324 r/w 34 (wrongful restraint and causing hurt). The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient incriminating evidence, as the injured first informant (PW1) testified he did not know the assailants and that the matter had been settled between the parties. With no credible evidence connecting the accused to the occurrence, the court found all defendants not guilty and set them at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Further evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Referred to Mediator

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  12. 25-Jun-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  13. 02-May-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  14. 19-Mar-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  15. 04-Feb-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  16. 19-Dec-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  17. 21-Oct-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  18. 27-Aug-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  19. 01-Jul-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  20. 17-May-2024

    No sitting notified

  21. 22-Mar-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  22. 29-Jan-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  23. 04-Dec-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  24. 04-Oct-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  25. 13-Jul-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  26. 05-May-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  27. 24-Feb-2023

    for evidence.

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  28. 13-Dec-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  29. 12-Jul-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  30. 18-Dec-2021

    Summons in Ca

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  31. 20-Sep-2021

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  32. 11-May-2021

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  33. 16-Jan-2021

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  34. 14-Oct-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  35. 22-Jul-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 28-Apr-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200398/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Kodungallur Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324 r/w 34 (wrongful restraint and causing hurt). The court found the prosecution's case lacked sufficient incriminating evidence, as the injured first informant (PW1) testified he did not know the assailants and that the matter had been settled between the parties. With no credible evidence connecting the accused to the occurrence, the court found all defendants not guilty and set them at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case