SIP vs Venkararaman, Advocate - Sinesh A B — 200323/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTR200010732019

Filing Number

200323/2019

Filing Date

08-Mar-2019

Registration No

200323/2019

Registration Date

08-Mar-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur

Judge

1-Magistrate Kodungallur

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

73

Police Station

VALAPPAD

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Venkararaman, Advocate - Sinesh A B

  2. 2.Santhakumari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted Venkataraman and Santhakumari of dowry-related cruelty charges under Section 498A IPC, finding material inconsistencies between the complainant's FIR and court testimony, an unexplained 1.5-year delay in filing the complaint after leaving the matrimonial home, lack of medical evidence despite alleged physical assault, and hearsay testimony from supporting witnesses. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of cruelty beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  4. 07-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Steps if any

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  14. 26-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  17. 06-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  18. 10-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  20. 27-Aug-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  21. 06-Aug-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  23. 10-Jun-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  24. 06-May-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  25. 11-Mar-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  26. 10-Feb-2025

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  27. 11-Dec-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  28. 08-Nov-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  29. 11-Oct-2024

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  30. 06-Sep-2024

    82-83 Steps

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  31. 18-Jul-2024

    NBW to cws

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  32. 30-Apr-2024

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  33. 05-Mar-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  34. 11-Jan-2024

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  35. 02-Nov-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  36. 25-Sep-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  37. 20-Sep-2023

    Oders in Cmp

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  38. 18-Aug-2023

    For hearing in Cmp

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  39. 26-Jul-2023

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  40. 20-Jun-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  41. 27-Apr-2023

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  42. 06-Feb-2023

    Appearance Of Parties

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  43. 20-Dec-2022

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  44. 26-Sep-2022

    To summon witness

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  45. 16-Aug-2022

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  46. 26-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Parties

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  47. 30-Jun-2022

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  48. 10-May-2022

    Issue Summons

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  49. 26-Feb-2022

    Appearance of Accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  50. 22-Feb-2022

    Call with Mp

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  51. 18-Jan-2022

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  52. 11-Jan-2022

    Call with Mp

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  53. 28-Dec-2021

    Call with Mp

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  54. 28-Jun-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  55. 12-Mar-2021

    Adjourned

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  56. 23-Nov-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  57. 13-Aug-2020

    Call on

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  58. 18-May-2020

    For framing charge

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  59. 10-Jan-2020

    For framing charge

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  60. 21-Dec-2019

    No sitting notified

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  61. 27-Aug-2019

    For appearance of the accused

    Magistrate Kodungallur

  62. 12-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 08-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200323/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted Venkataraman and Santhakumari of dowry-related cruelty charges under Section 498A IPC, finding material inconsistencies between the complainant's FIR and court testimony, an unexplained 1.5-year delay in filing the complaint after leaving the matrimonial home, lack of medical evidence despite alleged physical assault, and hearsay testimony from supporting witnesses. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of cruelty beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case