SIP vs Disang — 200324/2020
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,427,34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLTR200005332020
Filing Number
200324/2020
Filing Date
29-01-2020
Registration No
200324/2020
Registration Date
29-01-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
VALAPPAD
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)
Respondent(s)
Disang
Rahul@ Akru
Harikrishnan,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
For further hearing
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST. 324 OF 2020 The court acquitted all three accused (Disang, Rahul @ Akru, and Harikrishnan) of charges under IPC Sections 447 and 427 r/w 34 for alleged criminal trespass and mischief involving stone-pelting at a house in Valapad Village on 27.07.2019. The magistrate found the prosecution's case insufficient because none of the witnesses actually witnessed the stone-pelting incident or identified the accused at the scene; their testimony covered only the aftermath (damage to property). The court determined the chain of circumstances was incomplete and incapable of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST. 324 OF 2020 The court acquitted all three accused (Disang, Rahul @ Akru, and Harikrishnan) of charges under IPC Sections 447 and 427 r/w 34 for alleged criminal trespass and mischief involving stone-pelting at a house in Valapad Village on 27.07.2019. The magistrate found the prosecution's case insufficient because none of the witnesses actually witnessed the stone-pelting incident or identified the accused at the scene; their testimony covered only the aftermath (damage to property). The court determined the chain of circumstances was incomplete and incapable of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts