SIP vs Manikanadan — 200059/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,324,294(b). Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 248 CR.PC on 25th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLTR200002492019
Filing Number
200059/2019
Filing Date
14-01-2019
Registration No
200059/2019
Registration Date
14-01-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur
Judge
1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 248 CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
818
Police Station
MATHILAKAM
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIP (Sub-Inspector of Police)
Respondent(s)
Manikanadan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MAGISTRATE KODUNGALLUR
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 200059/2019 (SIP v. Manikanadan) Court Decision: The Kodungallur Magistrate found Manikanadan (age 43) guilty of wrongful restraint (IPC §341) and voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon (IPC §324), but acquitted him of obscene words offense (IPC §294(b)). The court sentenced him to one month simple imprisonment for §341 and one year imprisonment plus ₹10,000 fine for §324 (with one additional month imprisonment if fine unpaid). Sentences run concurrently. Key Reasoning: The court relied on credible corroborated evidence from the injured victim, an independent temple priest eyewitness, and medical examination findings confirming injuries consistent with assault by wooden stick on December 8, 2018. Despite a three-day reporting delay and minor discrepancies, the core prosecution case was sufficiently proved through reliable testimony and physical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 200059/2019 (SIP v. Manikanadan) Court Decision: The Kodungallur Magistrate found Manikanadan (age 43) guilty of wrongful restraint (IPC §341) and voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon (IPC §324), but acquitted him of obscene words offense (IPC §294(b)). The court sentenced him to one month simple imprisonment for §341 and one year imprisonment plus ₹10,000 fine for §324 (with one additional month imprisonment if fine unpaid). Sentences run concurrently. Key Reasoning: The court relied on credible corroborated evidence from the injured victim, an independent temple priest eyewitness, and medical examination findings confirming injuries consistent with assault by wooden stick on December 8, 2018. Despite a three-day reporting delay and minor discrepancies, the core prosecution case was sufficiently proved through reliable testimony and physical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts